.png)
Eduservices Group integrated the Loumo platform to transform its certification process.
The objective: to transition from manual and scattered management to a centralized, neutral, and high-performing model.
Full Accessibility: National brand management, such as IPAC Bachelor Factory, and campus management monitor all exams.
Local Autonomy: Each collaborator has dedicated access to their institution to submit exam topics and papers. This unique interface allows for tracking grading progress, managing unforeseen issues in conjunction with Loumo's teams, and centralizing all results.
Versatility of Formats and Content: The solution handles all types of assessments (case studies, certification exams, internship reports, portfolios) and all submission formats, whether handwritten or typed.
Loumo is a service that addresses the challenges encountered in processing and standardizing grading.
Our decision to collaborate was driven by the quality, rigor, and consistency of the grading, which enhances the reliability of our assessments and ensures fairness among students.
Finally, Loumo's responsiveness and attentive customer service enable effective and seamless collaboration for our educational teams.
.png)
Clémence Anna
Director of Studies - Toulouse Campus
Thanks to this partnership, initiated in 2025, pedagogical management has gained in peace of mind and reliability.
Processing Capacity: +350 exams managed per year, representing over 10,000 papers.
Meeting Deadlines: Transition from uncertain turnaround times to guaranteed feedback within 15 days.
Academic Reliability: Alignment of continuous assessment results with state examination standards, such as BTS.
Time Savings: Educational managers are relieved of grading logistics.
Secure Audit: Through a direct connection with France Compétences, standards are rigorously monitored, guaranteeing full compliance for each certification.
The Challenge
On the Toulouse campus, exam management for the Eduservices Group presented a significant logistical and educational challenge. With 8 schools (IPAC Bachelor Factory, MBway, MyDigitalSchool, IHECF, ESIMODE, WIN, Studio M, ESICAD) and 2000 students, the internal grading methods were showing their limitations.
Critical grading turnaround times: Grade feedback from instructors ranged from 2 weeks to 1.5 months, causing student anxiety and incessant follow-ups.
A risk of grading bias: the high number of graders made it difficult to maintain fairness in evaluation.
Overwhelmed Operational Workload: Educational managers dedicated a significant portion of their time to managing exam papers and tracking instructors.
Concerns about Assessment: Some students expressed doubts about the objectivity of grading.